Library

The place where triangulation becomes a body of concepts instead of a loose instinct.

The library is where the evidentiary layer compounds: source schemas, claim types, chronology models, contradiction objects, confidence states, correction rules, and future research chapters.

What the library holds

01

Canonical definitions for claims, sources, and evidence objects.

02

Models for chronology, contradiction, and confidence states.

03

Research directions for future truth infrastructure surfaces.

Library shelves

The triangulation layer needs concepts stable enough to be reused across products.

Source schemas

Definitions for primary artifacts, derivative reporting, witness accounts, official statements, and correction objects.

Claim schemas

Ways of distinguishing direct factual claims, interpretive claims, causal claims, and contested attributions.

Chronology models

Structures for event ordering, update chains, and how temporal uncertainty should be represented rather than hidden.

Confidence models

The vocabulary and mechanics for publishing strong, provisional, contested, and unresolved states in a durable way.

Case studies

Worked examples showing how triangulation behaves under breaking events, disputed histories, and adversarial information fields.

Cross-reference potential

Later this library can be linked directly with the consensus hub, since stronger public understanding still depends on these underlying objects.

Library line

“Triangulation becomes serious when its concepts are explicit enough to survive reuse.”

This completes the first full sibling hub for Triangulating the Truth inside Aram’s truth infrastructure portal.